Friday, March 28, 2025

Ambrose's Comments in On the Institution of Virgins being "unfavorable to Mary's coredemptive role"

In his On the Institution of Virgins, Ambrose of Milan wrote :

 

Stabat ante crucem mater, et fugientibus viris, stabat intrepida. Videte utrum pudorem mutare potuerit mater Jesu, quae animum non muta vit. Spectabat piis oculis filii vulnera, per quem sciebat omnibus futu- ram redemptionem. Stabat non degeneri mater spectaculo, quae non metuebat peremptorem. Pendebat in cruce filius, mater se persecu- toribus offerebat. Si hoc solum esset ut ante filium prosterneretur, laudandus pietatis affectus, quod superstes filio esse nolebat : sin vero ut cum filio moreretur, cum eodem gestiebat resurgere, non ignara mysterii quod genuisset resurrecturum : simul quae publico usui im- pendi mortem filii noverat, praestolabatur si forte etiam sua morte publico muneri aliquid adderetur. Sed Christi passio adjutorio non eguit, sicut ipse Dominus longe ante praedixit : « Et respexi, et non erat au- xiliator : et attendi et nemo suscipiebat : et liberabo eos brachio meo. » Quomodo ergo extorqueri potuit integritas Mariae, quae fugientibus apostolis, supplicia non metuebat, sed ipsa se offerebat periculis ? (Ambrose, De Inst. Virg. 7 :49f. PL 16 :318c-319a)

 

English translation :

 

The mother stood before the cross, and while the men fled, she stood fearless. See whether the mother of Jesus, who did not change her resolve, could have changed her modesty. With devout eyes, she gazed upon the wounds of her Son, through whom she knew redemption would come for all.

 

The mother did not shrink from such a dreadful spectacle; she did not fear the executioner. Her Son hung on the cross, and she offered herself to His persecutors. If it were only so that she might fall prostrate before her Son, her devotion would be praiseworthy, since she did not wish to outlive Him. But if it were so that she might die with Him, she longed to rise with Him as well, fully aware of the mystery that He, whom she had borne, would rise again.

 

At the same time, knowing that the death of her Son was for the benefit of all, she awaited to see whether perhaps even her own death might contribute something to that public sacrifice. However, Christ’s Passion needed no assistance, as the Lord Himself had long before foretold: "I looked, and there was no one to help; I observed, and no one sustained me; therefore, I will save them with my own arm."

 

How, then, could Mary's integrity be shaken? While the apostles fled, she did not fear suffering but instead offered herself to danger.

 

In spite of Ambrose’s very high Mariology, as one commentator noted:

 

The passage above is unfavorable to Mary’s coredemptive role . . . (Charles William Neumann, The Virgin Mary in the Works of Saint Ambrose [Contributions in the History of Early Christian Literature and Theology 17; Fribourg: The University Press, 1962], 265)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Blog Archive