Monday, March 24, 2025

Liane M. Feldman on the Distinction Between "Impurities," "Transgressions," and "Sins" in Leviticus 16

  

There are three categories of contaminants and they are treated differently by Yahweh. Impurities ( טמאת ) are inevitable and simply a fact of life in the midst of the Israelites, precisely as the latter half of v. 16 describes. Similarly, the contamination caused from unintentional sins can be removed by bringing a purification offering to the tabernacle (Lev 4). Transgressions ( פשעים ) and sins ( חטאת ) are something entirely different and are therefore disposed of in an entirely different way. This is the purpose of the goat for Azazel. A few moments later in Yahweh’s instructions, he tells Aaron that he will lay both of his hands on the head of the goat for Azazel and confess the iniquities ( עונות ), transgressions ( פשעים ), and sins חטאת) ) over its head (16:21). In this verse, three categories are used – iniquity, transgression, and sin. These categories are not explicitly defined by Yahweh. Indeed, the term פשע appears only in Lev 16. The term עון appears a number of times, both in the context of intentional sins and in the context of unintentional sins that have not been recognized and therefore no sacrifice has been brought for them. The term חטאת is used in numerous contexts throughout the Priestly Narrative and appears to be a more general term for unintentional sin. These three terms, then, serve to describe the whole range of sins in the Priestly Narrative, from unintentional sin that has been recognized ( חטאת ) to unintentional sin that has gone unrecognized or ignored ( עון ) to intentional sin (  .(פשע

 

Aaron’s act of hand-laying and confession serves to transfer the contamination caused by these sins and transgressions from the sanctuary to the goat. This goat is not slaughtered and sacrificed like the other goat, however. Bearing the sins and transgressions of the Israelites, it is led out of the tent of meeting and out of the camp entirely into the wilderness (16:21b–22). This is what removes the transgressions and intentional sins of the Israelites from Yahweh’s presence, not the application of the blood on the outer altar.38 Unlike the contamination caused by unintentional sins, which can be eliminated by the blood of a purification offering, the contamination caused by intentional sins must be understood as permanent. It can be removed and relocated, moved from one space to another, but it cannot be eliminated entirely. When Aaron confesses over the goat’s head, he relocates the contamination caused by intentional sins to the goat. He also relocates any residual contamination from inadvertent sins, whether that be because they went unrecognized or were ignored. When the goat carries this contamination, it carries them out of Yahweh’s presence and to an area that is far enough removed that they can no longer have an effect on him. Just as a person afflicted with impurifying skin disease is sent beyond the borders of the camp so they do not affect Yahweh, this goat is similarly banished.

 

The distinction between impurities and transgressions/intentional sins in these tabernacle purification instructions serves to refine boundaries in the story. The multi-stage purification procedure reinforces and adds detail to the different spaces already sketched in Yahweh’s speeches in Lev 1–7 and 11–15. The whole premise of these instructions is to emphasize that the inner sanctuary is off-limits to almost everyone almost all of the time. It is Yahweh’s private space and must be treated as such. Only Aaron is allowed to enter Yahweh’s inner chamber, and then only for specific purpose of removing contamination that has accumulated in it. The two-part structure to this ritual also furthers the characterization of Yahweh in the story by revealing a certain level of optimism on his part. While impurities are inevitable, they are also fixable. Intentional sins are not. The individual who commits one cannot be forgiven and the effect it has on the tabernacle cannot be completely eliminated, only displaced to another location. The creation of a single ritual to remove the intentional sins from his midst suggests that Yahweh does not expect intentional sins to be a perennial problem for the Israelites. Even though he has created a safeguard in case they do not, Yahweh expects that the Israelites will obey his commands (Liane M. Feldman, The Story of Sacrifice: Ritual and Narrative in the Priestly Source [Forschungen zum Alten Testament 141; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2020], 163-65)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Blog Archive