Thursday, January 8, 2026

Alicia D. Myers on Jesus's Death as an Exorcism and an "Apotropaic Purification" in the Gospel of John

  

The Gospel of John emphasizes this freedom [from Satan and sin] by characterizing Jesus’s death and resurrection as an exorcism, a “casting out of the Ruler of this world” that draws believers into a union with the divine (12:31-36). This exorcism purifies believers by removing the presence of the demonic Ruler from their midst, and it acts as an apotropaic to protect believers from the evil one after Jesus’s departure (17:15). While the bronze serpent and Passover lamb kept previous Israelites from physical death, Jesus’s protection promises believers “eternal life” or “eternity life” (e.g., 3:14-16, 36; 4:14, 36; 5:24). Rather than preventing physical death, Coloe argues “eternity life” is about the quality of life rather than just its duration. It is a connection to God, the source of life who “raises the dead” and has given Jesus “life in himself” (5:21-26).

 

In John’s Gospel, Jesus “makes life” (5:22) by healing others and raising himself from the dead (10:17018). Jesus’s resurrection and return to the Father enables the extension of his life-making to believers through the Holy Spirit, who continues to protect those “given” to Jesus even after his departure (e.g., 6:37-45, 61-65; 10:28; 17:6-12; 18:8-9). In this way, the Gospel presents Jesus’s ministry as one of exorcism and apotropaism, extending God’s divine presence from the limits of Jesus’s physical person to the boundlessness of the Spirit. (Alicia D. Myers, The Theology of the Gospel of John [New New Testament Theology; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025], 123-24, comment in square brackets added for clarification)

 

On exorcism as “Apotropaic Purification”:

 

Rather than performing individual exorcisms, or even many individual healings (and no healings directly related to issues of ritual purity), John’s Jesus performs one exorcism. This exorcism, though, similarly removes impurity, just as other exorcisms were understood to do in the ancient Mediterranean world. The demonic impurity possessing the world prevents creation from accessing safely the life-giving holiness of God. Instead, the Ruler keeps the world in bondage to sin, stuck on a path of death and destruction as discussed above. Although rejected by the world, God does not abandon or condemn it; instead, God sends Jesus to save it by purifying and offering believers a way to the Father.

 

John changes the focus from individuals and people found in the Synoptics to an exorcism of the entire world. As part of this change, Jesus is even more emphatically portrayed as the location of God’s presence in the world. For this reason, his conflicts with the temple cult and priestly class are even more striking, contributing to John’s problematic presentation of the Jews. As in the Synoptics, these conflicts underscore the finality of the purity and sanctification provided by means of Jesus.

 

. . .

 

It should not be surprising, then, that Jesus’s work is explicitly depicted as a purification in John’s Gospel. In 13:10-11, Jesus declares his disciples (minus Judas) “purified” after washing their feet. In 15:2, Jesus uses the metaphor of the vine and branches to describe God as a gardener, “taking up” (cf. 1:29) fruitless branches, and “purifying” those that remain so they produce more fruit. In 15:3, he declares that his disciples “are already purified because of the word which I have spoken” (cf. Wis 16:12). Moreover, Jesus repeatedly protects his disciples, warding off the evil one by keeping everyone whom the Father has given him safe, aside from the “son of destruction” (John 17:12). As holiness incarnate, Jesus purifies those who accept his words, and continues to guard them, a living apotropaic, until his death enables the extension of this sanctification.

 

As an exorcism, Jesus’s death and resurrection purifies his disciples, but it also wards off evil like the blood of the Passover lamb and the exalted snake in the wilderness. In this way, Jesus’s death facilitates God’s answering Jesus’s prayer to extend his sanctifying and apotropaic work beyond those believers who saw him to all those who “are believing in me through their word” (17:30). Jesus’s request reads, in part: “Sanctify them in the truth: your word is truth. Just as you sent me into the world, so also have I sent them into the world. And on behalf of them I am sanctifying myself, so that they might also be sanctified in truth” (17:15-19, emphasis added). In the culmination of John’s apocalyptic irony, Jesus’s death becomes the moment of sanctification and victory (16:33). When Jesus dies, it appears that Satan has succeeded in killing life, darkness has overcome light, and creation seems undone. Those with the Gospel’s apocalyptic insight, however, know that this is no defeat. Rather, it is the means of God’s victory that comes with Jesus’s resurrection, return to the Father, and most importantly, his giving of the Holy Spirit. With his death and resurrection, Jesus shows his words, and therefore the Word of God to be true (17:17; cf. 7:33-39; 8:14-30; 13:31-35; 16:12-24). He has “laid down his life on behalf of” his sheep and taken it back up again (cf. 10:17-18; 13:1-10).

 

According to 17:15-19, trusting in truth sanctifies Jesus’s disciples; it releases them from the grip of sin. It does so by casting outside the Ruler whose lies desire nothing but destruction and murder (8:31-59). Once cleansed, the disciples are possessed by the Spirit of Truth, the Holy Spirit, whose presence prevents repossession by the Ruler. In this way, the Spirit guards believers from the evil one so that they may continue God’s mission in the world. The Spirit is the living apotropaic whose presence extends to all believers in all places and times. Equipped in this way, the disciples continue God’s mission in the world, forgive sins, and even approach God with requests in Jesus’s name (15:26-27; 16:6-28; 20:22-23). (Alicia D. Myers, The Theology of the Gospel of John [New New Testament Theology; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2025], 125, 129-31)

 

Further Reading:

 

Torsten Löfstedt on the Lack of Exorcisms and Demon Possessions in the Gospel of John

Blog Archive