Saturday, March 1, 2025

Ruth Sheridan on Paul's metaphor of wage-earning in Romans 4

  

If we probe Paul’s metaphor of wage-earning labour in Rom 4.4-5, we begin to see how he connects doing work to having works. The everyday reality of a person working for wages provides Paul with his starting point (4.4): the worker has ‘wages’ (ὁ μισθὸς) credited to his account (λογίζομαι) as a ‘debt’ or ‘obligation’ (κατὰ ὀφείλημα), not as a gratuity (κατὰ χάριν). The contract of hire stipulates that when the worker performs his designated labour, his employer is obligated to pay him wages. These wages are the worker’s due; they are not a gift from the employer. There is a fine balance: the actual work undertaken by the employee places the employer in his debt (ὀφείλημα); it has to be repaid in the form of wages (ὁ μισθὸς). Wages constitute something owed to the worker – not a form of credit freely given in advance as it were – but something merited by the worker as a ‘reward’. These are the basic terms for the contract of employment familiar to first-century readers. (Ruth Sheridan, The Figure of Abraham in John 8: Text and Intertext [Library of New Testament Studies 619; T&T Clark, 2020], 263)

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Email for Logos.com Gift Card: IrishLDS87@gmail.com

Blog Archive