Friday, December 6, 2024

John R. Levison on Psalm 74:9 and the Prayer of Azariah 15

On Psa 74:9:

 

The recognition that this psalm is probably to be dated some time during the exile, after the destruction of Jerusalem in 587 BCE, may be considered enough evidence to discount its use as postexilic evident for the view that prophecy ceased; the psalm may not look to the distant past. In its historical context, whether exilic or Maccabean, the psalm reflects a situation in which the prophets who predicted salvation are silenced by events and those who, like Jeremiah and Ezekiel, predicted correctly, continue to experience opprobrium. In this historical context, prophets have not ceased to exist but have fallen into disrepute (cf. Lam 2:14).

 

Regardless of date, the literary form of the psalm undermines its value as evidence that prophecy ceased. It is a community lament, which exaggerates the horrors of the community’s situation in order to solicit God’s help. One could argue analogously from the equally exaggerated lament in Lam 2:6, “the LORD has abolished in Zion festival and sabbath,” that the Sabbath ceased with the destruction of Jerusalem; such an inference would of course be incorrect. Neither the historical context nor the literary form of Ps 74, then, permits its use as evidence that a belief in the end of prophecy emerged during the postexilic and rabbinic periods. (John R. Levison, In Search of the Spirit, 2 vols. [Eugene, Oreg.: Cascade Books, 2024], 2:3-4)

 

 

On the Prayer of Azariah 15:

 

In our day we have no ruler, or prophet, or leader,
no burnt offering, or sacrifice, or oblation, or incense,
no place to make an offering before you and to find mercy.

 

Although probably written much later than the situation it purports to describe, this text is part of a lament that depicts the anarchy that followed upon the destruction of Jerusalem in 587 BCE. As in Ps 74, a community lament, we have to do here with “[a complaint about the lack of prophets]” and “[not a dogmatic idea of a prophetic era].” (Leivestad, “Dogma,” 292) At any rate, the elements of the immediate context, such as sacrifices and rulers, were in fact restored to Israel following the exile, so that it would require a blatant disregard for context to extrapolate a dogma of the ceasing of prophecy from the brief mention of the lack of prophets “in our day.” (John R. Levison, In Search of the Spirit, 2 vols. [Eugene, Oreg.: Cascade Books, 2024], 2:4)

 

 

 

 

To Support this Blog:

 

Patreon

Paypal

Venmo

Amazon Wishlist

Email for Amazon Gift card: ScripturalMormonism@gmail.com

Blog Archive