Thursday, June 25, 2026

Matthew Bryce Ervin on the Differences Between the Sacrifices of the Mosaic Covenant and those of Ezekiel's Eschatological Temple

  

The sacrifices described in Ezekiel are quite different than those administered under the Mosaic Covenant. Many of these differences are made apparent when juxtaposing the consecration of the altar in Exodus 29 against the consecration of the altar in Ezekiel 43:18–27. For example, in the Mosaic system, no goats were offered, while in the Ezekiel system a goat is offered on each of the seven days (Ezek 43:25). Another example is that the Mosaic called for applying blood on the horns of the altar (Exod 29:12), while Ezekiel’s instruction goes further with the blood also being applied to the corners and on the border around it (Ezek 43:20).

 

Other differences between the two sacrificial systems are found throughout Scripture. Most notably is that in the Mosaic System the Ark of the Covenant played a critical role, while it will not be missed or even remembered in the Millennium (Jer 3:16). The Ark was only ever a placeholder for the Messiah. In the Mosaic, only the high priest could enter the Holy of Holies (e.g., Heb 9:7). In Ezekiel’s system, all priests are permitted to enter (Ezek 44:15–16). In the Mosaic, only a Levite could be a priest, while Isaiah prophecies a time when Gentiles will occupy the office (Isa 66:18–21). In the Mosaic, Passover ordinances were performed by the male head of house (Exod 12:3), while Ezekiel mandates that the Prince oversees the feast for the nation as a whole (Ezek 45:21–24). There are still many more differences to be observed in Ezekiel. It was these very differences that kept the rabbis from accepting Ezekiel into the Hebrew Canon for some time. These differences highlight the fact that the prophet foresaw a new system and not a return to the old. (Matthew Bryce Ervin, One Thousand Years with Jesus: The Coming Messianic Kingdom [Eugene, Oreg.: Resource Publications, 2017], 112-13)

 

Blog Archive