Saturday, April 25, 2026

Mark 9:25-26 and the Ontological Existence of Evil Spirits

  

When Jesus saw that the people came running together, he rebuked the soul spirit, saying unto him, Thou dumb and deaf spirit, I charge thee, come out of him, and enter no more into him. And the spirit cried, and rent him sore, and came out of him: and he was as one dead; insomuch that many said, He is dead. (Mark 9:25-26)

 

In this passage, there is a numerical distinction of person between the demonized person and the "foul spirit." The Greek has Jesus address the unclean spirit, as seen in the use of the dative in the phrase ἐπετίμησεν τῷ πνεύματι τῷ ἀκαθάρτῳ λέγων αὐτω. Jesus also speaks to "τὸ ἄλαλον καὶ κωφὸν πνεῦμα" (the evil/unclean spirit) and commands such a spirit to come out (εισερχομαι) the demonized person. As with Luke 433-35, 40-41, this passage only makes sense if the biblical authors believed in the ontological existence of demons (contra Christadelphians and others).

 

Commenting on this text, Adela Yarbro Collins noted that:

 

Jesus’ statement, “I command you … and from now on, do not enter into him” (ἐγὼ ἐπιτάσσω σοικαὶ μηκέτι εἰσέλθῃς εἰς αὐτόν), is similar to Josephus’s account of an exorcism performed by a certain Eleazar, “he made him swear that he would never come back into him” (μηκέτʼ εἰς αὐτὸν ἐπανήξειν ὥρκου). Such commands appear to be a technique designed to prevent a relapse.

 

The departure of the spirit (v. 26) is described in terms similar to those of Jesus’ first exorcism (1:26). In both cases, the spirit “convulses” (σπαράσσω) the possessed person, although here “greatly” (πολλά) is added. In both cases, the spirit “cries out,” although different terms are used. Even if the cry is inarticulate, this element is an indication that the spirit itself is not mute; rather, it causes its victim to become mute (cf. T. Sol. 12:2). Distinctive here is the result of the departure of the spirit: the young man “became like a corpse” and the bystanders thought that he had died. Jesus then “raised him up and he rose” (ἤγειρεν αὐτὸν καὶ ἀνέστη). Although the story does not imply that the boy was actually dead, the dual expression in v. 27 attracts the attention of the audience and may call to mind the raising of the daughter of Jairus who had died. Jesus also grasped her hand; he asked her to “wake up” or “rise up” (ἔγειρε); and she also rose (ἀνέστη) (5:41–42). In both stories the extraordinary power of Jesus is gloriously manifested. (Adela Yarbro Collins and Harold W. Attridge, Mark: A Commentary on the Gospel of Mark [Hermeneia—a Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible; Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2007], 439; the reference to Josephus comes from Antiquities of the Jews 8.47)

 

Blog Archive