Thursday, April 23, 2026

Christopher R. Mooney on Augustine’s Theology and Warfield’s Popular False Dichotomy

  

BAPTISM AND THE MOMENT OF JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH

 

Augustine's overwhelming emphasis on faith, grace, and charity in his exegesis of Paul's soteriology is in striking contrast to the more overtly baptismal soteriology of Tertullian and Cyprian - as well as Ambrose. This can lead to a sense of tension between Augustine's ecclesiology and his theology of grace, as if the latter could be liberated from sacramental and ecclesial mediation. The nineteenth-century Calvinist scholar Benjamin Warfield found this tension to be irreconcilable and counted its resolution in favor of the absolute primacy of grace over all ecclesiastical mediation to be the Reformation's Augustinian triumph: "the Reformation, inwardly considered, was just the ultimate triumph of Augustine's doctrine of grace over Augustine's doctrine of the Church."6 But Augustine's reflections on the relationship between faith and grace are unintelligible except as reflections on the tradition and concrete practices of the North African Church: the one who is worthy to receive the grace of the Holy Spirit by faith in Augustine's Pauline commentaries is none other than the catechumen who approaches the sacrament with sincere faith in Lent and receives grace at Easter. There are not two accounts of grace, as if one were divine and invisible and another were sacramental and visible. Augustine's theology of justification by faith is not meant to provide a replacement account of God's grace in place of the catechumen's reception of the Holy Spirit in baptism; it is meant to further illuminate the spiritual reality of that event. In light of this, it is to baptism that we first turn, in order to call to mind the concrete ecclesial practices through which Augustine interpreted Paul. (Christopher R. Mooney, Augustine’s Theology of Justification by Faith [Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2026], 68)

 

Blog Archive