Saturday, April 25, 2026

Jaś Elsner (2022) on the Current Scholarly Consensus Regarding Early Christian Attitude Towards Art

  

Few disciplines have been more marked by repeated, competitive ideological investments from generations of Roman Catholic and Protestant scholars than the study of the early Church. In the case of ancient Christian art, the excessive Protestantism which determined the pure faith of both late ancient Judaism and early Christianity to have been aniconic, probably anti-iconic, even iconoclastic before the third century AD has been rightly corrected. But the current consensus on the enthusiasm of early Christians for art is probably also excessive. Despite the uses made of images by some third-century Christians – especially in Rome, to judge by our surviving archaeological evidence – Christianity never raised images to the level of scripture itself. This is in specific contrast to the stance taken by Mani (216–76) whose Picture-Book appears to have had canonical status in a universalizing salvific and scriptural religion that deliberately borrowed from, and adapted many features of, Christianity and was designed to be in direct opposition to it. Moreover, the strand of opposition to images within Christianity – an opposition on the one hand to pagan practice as well as some of ancient polytheism’s more complex intellectual discussions of art (such as Dio Chrysostom’s Olympian Oration, for example) and on the other to Manichaean visual scripture – remains a feature of some theological attitudes to art up to and including the period of Byzantine Iconoclasm in the eighth and ninth centuries. We may say that within the range of early Christianities, the use of art (largely to support burial, liturgy and scripture – never to replace any of them) represents one option, an option which remained predominant (though occasionally challenged) within the forms of Christianity that won out after the Edict of Toleration. (Jaś Elsner, “Graeco-Roman and Christian art in late antiquity,” in T&T Clark Handbook of The Early Church, ed. Ilaria L. E. Ramelli; John Anthony McGuckin; Piotr Ashwin-Siejkowski [London: T&T Clark, 2022], 351-52, emphasis in bold added)

 

Further Reading:


Answering Fundamentalist Protestants and Roman Catholic/Eastern Orthodox on Images/Icons



Blog Archive